Executive order mandating Chat room 2013 dirty free
Evaluation benchmarks would include recruitment, training and promotion.
This is the latest in a series of presidential executive orders proposing a strong dose of affirmative action for the federal bureaucracy.
The second part of the executive order, “Government-Wide Diversity and Inclusion and Strategic Plan,” lays out a framework for action.
While the order does not create a new agency, it would bring together top officials for establishing broad initiatives.
We are at our best when we draw on the talents of all parts of our society, and our greatest accomplishments are achieved when diverse perspectives are brought to bear to overcome our greatest challenges. As the Nation’s largest employer, the Federal Government has a special obligation to lead by example.
A commitment to equal opportunity, diversity and inclusion is critical for the Federal Government as an employer. Attaining a diverse, qualified work force is one of the cornerstones of the merit-based civil service…Wherever possible, the Federal Government must also seek to consolidate compliance efforts established through related or overlapping statutory mandates, directions from Executives Orders, and regulatory requirements.
Supporters claim that blacks, Hispanics, Asians and other “disadvantaged” classes of persons need enforceable mechanisms to compensate for a legacy of blocked opportunity.
The mandate, Executive Order 13583, is titled, “A Coordinated Government-Wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce.” One notices words such as “efficiency” and “accountability” didn’t make the cut.More to the point, the natural opponents of affirmative action, white “conservatives,” did go away; they shied away from challenging its core assumptions.Affirmative action – or “diversity” – should be seen as a form of what economists call “rent-seeking behavior.” That is, it enables certain people to realize benefits through State intervention that would be less obtainable through the market.That’s because over its four decades, “diversity” from the start has been about the allocation of economic rewards through force and guilt.The result most likely will be a federal bureaucracy committed more fully to racial payback. In May, I wrote a lengthy article for National Legal and Policy Center, “New Report Shows Federal Race Preferences More Entrenched,” centering on a then-new report issued by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) documenting the continued growth in federal affirmative action regulations.