Radiometric dating is wrong

We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.If you have any more questions about it don't hesitate to write.

It has become increasingly clear that these radiometric dating techniques agree with each other and as a whole, present a coherent picture in which the Earth was created a very long time ago.

(They conveniently forget to mention that the tree ring chronology was arranged by C14 dating.

The scientists who were trying to build the chronology found the tree rings so ambiguous that they could not decide which rings matched which (using the bristlecone pine).

If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).

Robert Whitelaw has done a very good job illustrating this theory using about 30,000 dates published in Radio Carbon over the last 40 years.

Search for radiometric dating is wrong:

radiometric dating is wrong-64radiometric dating is wrong-7radiometric dating is wrong-46radiometric dating is wrong-66

In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “radiometric dating is wrong”

  1. ” poster outlining activities after completed seatwork; classroom rules (generated by the students); classroom consequences (created with help from the students); and student names next to their job of the week.